Come See our New Website

Tuesday, March 18, 2014

Interview with David James Poissant

On Tuesday, March 18th at 8 p.m., writer and Hayden’s Ferry Review contributor David James Poissant will be giving a reading at The Tavern on Mill (404 S. Mill Ave.) from his debut book, The Heaven of Animals, a collection of short stories. The Heaven of Animals will be available for purchase at the reading, courtesy of ASU Bookstores.

Poissant teaches in the MFA Creative Writing program at the University of Central Florida, and his stories and essays have appeared in The AtlanticThe Chicago TribuneGlimmer TrainThe New York TimesPlayboy, and Ploughshares, among others. His work has been awarded the Matt Clark Prize, the George Garrett Fiction Award, the RopeWalk Fiction Chapbook Prize, and the Alice White Reeves Memorial Award from the National Society of Arts & Letters. His story The Hand Model appeared in HFR52.

With The Heaven of Animals just released, Poissant is already hard at work on his first novel, Class, Order, Family, forthcoming from Simon & Schuster. Jake Adler recently had an opportunity to speak with Poissant about his work as he travels the country on his book tour.

Jake Adler: What are the central themes of Heaven of Animals? What ties your collection of short stories together?

David James Poissant: Well, while there are a number of animals that wander through the stories, I feel like the central themes include love, loss, and atonement. Many of the narrators in these stories are seeking to right a wrong, to atone for something they've done—some cruelty to a family member or loved one. I'm really interested in the ways by which we hurt those we love most, sometimes on purpose, though often without meaning to. There is a decent dose of tragedy in the book, but humor too, and hope. My hope is that some hope shines through!

JA: How long have you been working with the book and what inspired the collection? Did writing one story prompt or inspire you to write another? Do you have a favorite story from Heaven of Animals?

DJP: I wrote the earliest story from the collection in 2004, and I finished the final revisions on the book in 2013, so I guess you could say that the collection took me nine years. But that's a little misleading, since, during that time, I also wrote and published another twenty stories and several essays, plus began work on the book that will be my first novel. I wouldn't say that I have a favorite story from the collection. I think that it depends on the day and my mood. I know from giving lots of readings that “100% Cotton and “What the Wolf Wants make for the best out-loud reading experiences for audiences. Otherwise, I don't know. Picking a favorite feels like trying to decide which of my kids I like best!

JA: What can you tell me about your forthcoming novel? How have you approached it differently than Heaven of Animals? How do you know when a story is becoming a novel, rather than simply a short story?

DJP: So, I wrote “Venn Diagram” and “Wake the Baby,” two of the stories in The Heaven of Animals, with no plans to return to those characters. But I just couldn’t shake them. The novel picks up about thirty-five years later. Richard Starling is a physicist. Lisa Starling is an ornithologist. They’ve spent the bulk of their careers at Cornell and enjoyed summers at their lake house in North Carolina. Their sons, Michael and Thad, are now grown and in their thirties. Michael is a pharmaceutical rep married to an elementary school art teacher. They live in Texas. Thad lives with his boyfriend, an up-and-coming painter, in Brooklyn. Then, one summer, Lisa calls her sons out of the blue to inform them that she and Richard are retiring early and that the lake house (which was always supposed to stay in the family) will be sold. The sons and their partners are summoned to North Carolina for a final week together as family, and, as tends to happen whenever family gets together for a week, things get tense. When a tragedy strikes the lake community, it reverberates through the lives of these six characters in a way that causes them to question not only why they’ve come here, but what comes next and whether they still want what they thought they wanted when the week began.

It’s a long novel (growing ever longer) told in six roving, third person, limited omniscient viewpoints. I think that I always knew that it would be a novel, just based on the scope of the story I wanted to tell, which felt larger than the constraints of a story or novella-length work.

JA: As a Creative Writing MFA professor at the University of Central Florida, what sort of trends do you see rising among young writers today? What do your students tend to struggle with most, and what have they done that has surprised you?

DJP: What's great about the writing in MFA programs today is that I don't see many "trends." People sometimes worry that MFA programs churn out writers who all sound the same, but that hasn't been my perspective, at least not based on my limited experience. I have students writing stories and novels, magic realism and psychological realism, tragedy and comedy, and everything on the spectrum from traditional to very experimental. It really runs the gamut, which is great. We have good students here, hardworking and committed writers. It's really an honor to get to work with them.

JA: What advice could you offer Creative Writing undergraduates or young writers seeking to apply for MFA programs?

DJP: Getting into MFA programs is getting harder and harder. My best advice is this: You can't charm or joke your way into a program with your cover letter. Better to take it seriously and be professional about it. Likewise, reference letters are important, but they seldom make or break an application. I'd say that 95% of the decision on who gets in at UCF (and, by extension, probably most MFA programs) comes down to the writing sample. Put forward your best, most polished work. Really, the secret is that there is no secret. We're all just looking for the best writers we can find. And, of course, that decision is subjective, so best to cast a wide net. For example, when I applied to programs in 2004, I applied to twelve and only got into one, the University of Arizona. But, if the program's the right program for you, all you need is one.

No comments: